Introduction
We have recently had a Supreme Court nominee testify under oath that she did not feel qualified to determine what a woman is. It is not that she is stupid, and it is not that she is smart. It is that she knows how to play the game. There have been many political footballs in the history of man, and now, womanhood itself is one of them.
Are we better for this? I’d say, no.
I’m going to set out two scenarios for you to consider. I don’t want you to form any judgments, until you have read them both. Stay impartial. You can do that, right? OK, here we go…
The Scenarios
Scenario One: In a certain culture, young girls are taught from birth that their well-being is dependent on men. Women cannot hope, in this aggressive world, to be able to hold their own at the forefront of their own life. And so, girls are taught that they must seek a man in their life to protect her, to see to her needs, to oversee her life. That man is at first her father, and later her husband. He will provide for her and her children. It is his responsibility, and he will be looked down upon if he shuns that responsibility.
Scenario Two: In a certain culture, young girls are taught from birth that their well-being is dependent on government. Women cannot hope, in this aggressive world, to be able to hold their own at the forefront of their own life. And so, girls are taught they must seek government to protect them, to see to their needs, to oversee their life. Government will provide for her and her children. It is government’s responsibility, and the government will be looked down upon if it shuns that responsibility.
OK, NOW form a judgment. Am I way off? Am I spot on? Is there anyone in the culture we know today :
Who says, “Hey girls, it’s your life, own it.”
Who says, “Don’t wait for us to tell you what to do.”
Who says, “Don’t wait for men or government to lead the way. Blaze your own trail.”
Who says, “Don’t expect special consideration due to your ‘weakness’. Are you indeed weak? Are you incapable of seeing to your own interests and needs?”
“Oh, but how can I be independent,”, a woman might say, “when men conspire to not pay me as much as they pay other men?” Well, wouldn’t that be a really GOOD reason to be independent? Wouldn’t it be a good time to develop skills and capabilities such that you needn’t be dependent on those dastardly men? Does it really improve anything to switch from being dependent upon men to being dependent upon government? Oh, you say, “But the government cares about me.” Well, so do fathers and husbands, even if they are misogynistic while they do it.
I would suggest that government is misogynistic. Doesn’t it treat you like it knows what’s best for you? Doesn’t it dictate to you, right down to deciding for you what a woman is and is not? Do government officials ever ask you for your opinion? Are they tolerant of your efforts to define yourself on your own terms? I’m trying to see what difference there really is between my two scenarios. Sure, it was a set-up. But am I wrong?
But it’s not just women. In the past, white men presumed to be the best judge of how blacks should be treated. Generally, those white men did not hate blacks or randomly lynch them. Those white men, and this was LAW, were expected to be compassionate to their chattel. What is chattel? Chattel is any living thing that is owned. Right there, in the law, it included horses, slaves, and wives and children. Feeling better now? Feeling better now that you know that men were obligated to take good care of their chattel, to provide for their needs?1
In Conclusion
If being taken care of is your goal, you could do worse than to be chattel. Being self-sufficient, blazing your own trail, taking your own responsibilities is a lot of damned work, and can be quite stressful. But when you succeed, on your own terms and not in some make-believe program, it can be downright thrilling. Even failure can be tolerable, when you can recognize that you gave it all you had and didn’t quit.
No, misogyny is misogyny, whether it comes from a man or from a government. If you won’t accept it from man, don’t accept it from government. Blanche Dubois “frequently relied upon the kindness of strangers.” Don’t be Blanch Dubois.2 Be your own agent. Whatever comes up, handle it instead of running to either Daddy or Big Brother.
Thank you for reading this article by
, a frequent contributor to Liberty Magazine and a seasoned veteran of writing. Please like and restack to keep this in the algorithm. Also make sure you leave a comment below to let us know how you feel about this article.Please take the time to check out the other articles that he has published through Liberty Magazine.
Also participate in this poll to let us know what you think of the Radical Individualist’s take on “What Choices Does A Woman Have?”.
Chattel Slavery: a system of slavery where humans are treated as personal property, bought, sold, and inherited like goods. It is characterized by the legal ownership of enslaved people, who are forced to work without wages or compensation. Chattel slavery has a long and complex history, dating back to ancient civilizations and persisting in parts of the world today, particularly in Muslim societies.
Blanche DuBois is a character from the movie, “A Street Car Named Desire,” according to Wikipedia, Blanche DuBois is described as an aging Southern belle who lives in a state of perpetual panic about her fading beauty and concerns about how others perceive her looks. She has an obsession with staying out of direct light, and even covers a light bulb with a paper lantern. She is desperate for attention and has a history of sexual promiscuity. She was formerly a teacher, who was fired for having an affair with one of her teenaged students.
It is that she knows how to play the game.
Katanji Brown is a Supreme Court Justice. The law is black and white and shouldn't be a game.
If Ms. Brown had said, "A woman is a being that is composed of XX chromosomes, can bear live young." She should have had the guts to say, "Men can not be women. Men are not women."
I heard a woman complaining the other day that women didn't feel safe going to their car at night. She simultaneously complained about the issue, somehow indicating that government should be so all powerful as to make all walking at night safe (and what a nightmare government that would be!) and complained about men offering to walk her there.
This whole thing depends upon certain facts. Those facts don't change according to your desire to choose.