[Edited by Samara]
Introduction
I was scrolling on the good old X today, and, once again, I came upon the topic of immigration. Our first stop takes us to the small city of Springfield, Ohio, a city that none of you have probably heard of before.
Four years ago, Springfield had a population of 60,000 people. That changed during the Biden administration, who shipped 20,000 Haitians to the small city. As you can probably guess, the large influx of culturally different people has been a disaster.
According to the New York Times, this has put pressure on housing, schools, and hospitals. The community health clinic saw an increase of Haitian patients from 115 to 1,500 between 2021 and 2023.
Other clinics have lost productivity due to language barriers, which also causes them to have to hire French and Creole speakers. Schools have seen a massive influx of enrollments, in turn forcing them to hire more teachers as well as interpreters.
The new arrivals has also had an impact on the housing market, with landlords preferring to rent to Haitians, who are willing to pay for higher rent. This in turn displaces natives who aren’t able to afford the increase in prices and as a result get passed over.
Of course, the article being cited is making light of the situation, which is hilarious since they lay out the information showing the negative effects at the same time. Just goes to show that even in the face of their own research, the corporate press will deny reality.
You may remember that Haiti has been in civil strife for some time. The country has been in a state of constant civil unrest and war for years, with gangs going around killing people. There have even been reports of cannibalism.
Yet despite this, the Biden-Harris administration has thought nothing of bringing thousands of Haitians to resettle in the United States. We do not know who they are, what they were doing in Haiti, or anything else.
In the same town of Springfield, there was a post by a concerned citizen that relayed how a neighbor’s daughter had lost her cat. The cat was later found hanging from a branch, in the style of butchering. They were informed that it was to be eaten. This was reported to be happening to other animals in the area as well, such as dogs, ducks, and geese.
[Editors note: This has been proven to be false according to the original poster, Kimberly Newton. However, it should be noted that in Haiti they do in fact eat whatever they can find, including cats and dogs, because of how destitute the population is, and this has been confirmed by Haitian-Americans on social media.]
As a cat owner myself, this is quite concerning. These animals are not meant to be eaten like kebabs. We do not eat cats in America, we do not eat dogs in America. What next? Will we see horses eaten too?
Here is the other question: if this is happening in small town Ohio, where else is this going on? Where else are we seeing cats being butchered due to Biden-Harris’ irresponsible immigration policies?
How can you say that illegal immigration has no economic cost for Americans when Springfield, Ohio, has given you all the reasons why, with the receipts, that it does? This is just one small place, imagine how it is in areas impacted by higher numbers.
*EDITORS NOTE*
Enoch Powell predicted all of the plight that the West is facing back in 1968. He was shunned by his “conservative” colleagues and labeled a racist, despite the fact that he learned Urdu to better represent his Pakistani constituents. Powell would exit political life and Margaret Thatcher, someone that shunned him as well, would become the preeminent conservative force in the U.K., yet even she paled in comparison to his true conservatism and political foresight.
I truly wish no ill on anyone, but the fact remains that we are seeing a cultural incompatibility when our government decides to dump third world migrants in small town USA. Yes, there is clearly a cultural difference here.
Imagine, if you will, Tokyo. The worlds largest city, but also one of the cleanest,1 with none of the downsides of Los Angeles or San Francisco. Populated nearly entirely by ethnic Japanese (2.3% are ethnically non-Japanese). What would be the result if we took a hundred-thousand Haitians and plopped them in the middle of Tokyo?
The result would be similar. Thankfully, our good friends in Japan actually seem to care about their cultural integrity and aren’t engaging in such silly politics like our leaders in America are. We should strive to be like Japan.2
The fact of the matter is that our politicians pushing these policies are, to put it bluntly, traitors to national and cultural integrity. That things have gotten as bad as household pets being eaten by migrants is testament to that.
If I were Donald Trump, I would be blasting the Springfield situation across all media. Thankfully, it seems like his campaign (JD Vance especially) has gotten wind of this, as I have seen many “save our pets” images across X. Yet people were out here trying to convince me that JD Vance was a bad pick.
Since I am here complaining about the rampant migration problem in the United States, I figure that I ought to also include my personal solution to it.
The Oceanic Solution
I believe that it is time to declare illegal immigration and forced migration a national emergency. The National Emergencies Act passed in 1976 ended all previous national emergencies and formalized the emergency powers of the President.
We have had national emergencies declared many times over the past few decades, and most of the time you wouldn’t even know that they have been declared. For example, Trump used a national emergency to circumvent funding to his border wall project after being unable to get funds from congress.3
Others, like Trump’s Proclamation 9994 regarding the COVID-19 outbreak, are much more noticeable. We all remember the broad powers given to the government during the early days of Covid that turned out not to benefit anyone at all.
Instead of locking our people down and forcing them to take vaccines, we should use these powers to defend the cultural and demographic integrity of the United States? On day one, Trump should invoke a national emergency for the illegal immigration issue.
The President should use this excuse to direct the Department of Homeland Security and the Military to carry out mass deportations akin to the one carried out by President Eisenhower in the 50s.4
We can then use this directive to override the so-called sanctuary cities and force them to comply with immigration law. There is nothing illegal here, we would only be aggressively enforcing the laws that are already on the books, because for whatever reason they have been ignored.
If there is any resistance to this newfound enforcement of immigration law by these sanctuary cities, the president should invoke the Insurrection Act and declare these cities to be in rebellion against the lawful authority of the United States government.
The politicians and law enforcement who are guilty of this obstruction should be placed under arrest and taken into custody by federal law enforcement or military personnel. These politicians will then be replaced by military governors who will enforce the laws until the national emergency passes and new elections in these areas can be called.
I would also move to make the entirety of the US/Mexico border zone directly administered by the military and Homeland Security. This zone would reach from 1-5 miles into the interior depending on the severity.
Elections and state authority in areas within this zone will not be impeded as it will be strictly for immigration enforcement purposes. No longer will Texas have to call for help for they shall receive it directly.
In my opinion, it is silly that I even have to be suggesting these heavy-handed measures at all. This could have all been unnecessary had our politicians just followed the law as was written. However, this has been going on for decades, it cannot be fixed by half-measures.5
Congress has failed to act, so the only thing left to do is for the executive to act as commanded by their duties as President of the United States.
Conclusion
No more shall we have kittens and puppies being used as food for people who should not be here in the first place, allowed in by traitorous politicians who have no loyalty to those they represent. I ask the so-called “childless cat ladies” this: who do you care about more, your cats, or illegal aliens?
I do not expect Trump to fulfil the above plan as I envision it, but I still believe that the contrast between him and Harris cannot be any clearer.
If anyone else has their own version of the Oceanic Plan, I invite you to offer it in the comments below. I am interested in hearing solutions to this problem.
Did you read Oceanus’ last article with Liberty Magazine?
Thank you for reading this article by
. Please like and restack to keep this in the algorithm. Also make sure you leave a comment below to let us know how you feel about this article.Participate in the poll below:
Here's a half hour podcast interview one of the government officials from Springfield. It's very informative, not vindictive. And no one would want to have to experience what they're experiencing.
https://989theanswer.com/podcast/episode/11955/twr-09-12-segs-1-2-3-kyle-koehler-springfields-cla