Thoughts on the Future
Kamala Harris' America should she win the white house based on her policies so far.
The Democratic and Republican National Conventions have concluded. Donald Trump and Kamala Harris will face off against each other in November. Whichever candidate wins will have free reign of control for four years.
Trump and Kamala represent very different visions for the future of the country. We see that advertised daily. The Trump camp paints Kamala as a walking disaster who is partially responsible for the Biden administration’s flops. The Harris campaign paints Trump as a dangerous authoritarian who wants to instate dictatorship.
These are very simplified messages that the average “normie” voter will hear with little to no deeper perspective. I argue that it is much more complex than what our candidates are making it out to be.
I want to make my biases clear: I am supporting Trump in November. If you don’t like Trump, you probably will not agree with most of this piece. However, I challenge you to point out how I am wrong. This isn’t going to simply be a hit piece on Harris.
The Harris Ascendency
I called Harris becoming an important factor in politics way back in 2019, during her failed run in the Democratic Primaries. Despite being on the right, I had much overlap with the Sanders and Gabbard left, who were very critical of Harris.
As you recall, she dropped out very early after a poor debate performance against Hawaii Representative Tulsi Gabbard (who is now supporting Trump, funnily enough). People supporting Sanders and Gabbard sighed in relief. In their eyes, she was just another Hillary Clinton.
When the rest of the Democratic field dropped out and threw their support behind Joe Biden over Bernie Sanders, I had an itching feeling that Harris would be back. Biden had vowed that his running mate would be a woman. We knew sure as heck that he wasn’t talking about Gabbard, and guess what? It turned out to be Harris.
Viewing as an outsider, it was very confusing to me, from a strategic mindset, why he would pick Kamala of all people. Some pointed back to Ronald Reagan picking his primary opponent George H.W. Bush. The difference was that Bush came in second place, Kamala came in last.
She also provided no location value. Harris is from California, a deep blue state on the west coast. What value does she provide in elections where the main point of contention is the upper Midwest Rust Belt? Perhaps she does better with minority voters, but the white working class? No.
Despite this, due to the Covid Crisis, Joe Biden ended up winning the 2020 elections by less than 40,000 votes across three swing states. This meant that Kamala Harris, who came last in the primary, continued her journey of falling upwards, this time into the position of Vice President.
In her nearly four years in this new position, she has been very unremarkable, so much so that for most of the time she was barely seen. She failed her first big assignment, in which she was sent to discover the “root causes” of illegal immigration.
While she was looking for these root causes, she forgot to shut the door on her way out. Border crossings increased to unprecedented levels. Border towns were being overwhelmed with illegal aliens and were receiving no relief.
The entire assignment was a political wild goose chase from the beginning. Even the most uninformed voter knows what the root causes of illegal immigration are. Why send Harris to find out the obvious? The administration wanted every excuse they could find to keep the border open.
After this failure of epic proportions, Harris took a back seat so that the new incompetent, Alejandro Mayorkas, could continue her legacy of failure on the border. It was around this time that she started fading into the background.
This near total invisibility didn’t last. In 2022, Republicans retook the House of Representatives, and Democrats had a one vote majority in the Senate. As the Vice President, she would have to preside over tie-breaking votes.
As time went on and faith in Joe Biden to win the 2024 elections decreased, certain sectors of the Democratic Party started looking for a replacement. One of these potential replacements was, of course, Kamala Harris.
Despite being the obvious choice as Vice President, many in her own party, even, it seemed, Joe Biden, doubted her ability to win. Before Biden dropped out, she was one of the only other Democratic politicians that consistently polled worse than he did. It seemed that his strategy of picking the least popular primary contender as a running mate was about to come back to bite him.
Then came the breaking point: the first presidential debate. Joe bombed harder than everyone expected that he would. A civil war erupted in the Democratic Party in which multiple high-profile politicians were calling for him to step aside. The donors publicly stated that they were cutting off the money pipeline.
At first, Biden fought against this insurrection. It looked as if he had made up his mind to stay in no matter what the big donors or big politicians said. Logically, it made sense: he won the primaries, he got the delegates, to drop out at this point would mean that the entire primary would have been one big waste of time.
Yet, after all that big talk, something changed his mind, and he announced last month that he would be dropping out of the race. He threw his support behind Kamala Harris and said that he would focus on governing until January.
Almost immediately, there was a giant reversal. The Vice President, who for years remained barely visible in the background, became the face of the party while Biden faded into the background.
Suddenly, Harris, who consistently polled worse than Biden against Trump for years, saw a reversal in which she was leading by a considerable margin. The airwaves were bombarded with pro-Harris advertisements, nearly as much as Bloomberg in 2020.
How much of this newfound support is organic or astroturfed remains to be seen. It strikes me as odd that Kamala is suddenly surging in popularity. Where were all these Kamala supporters for the past four years? Who knows.
The Harris campaign, as I have said in previous writings, represents the victory of the Democratic Party donor class and ruling elites over the voter. Harris did not receive a single vote in the primaries yet has received the Democratic nomination for president.
I suppose you could say that technically a vote for Biden was also a vote for Harris, but that in of itself is not true considering how running mates aren’t usually formally announced until the convention.
There was, even if the possibility was small, a chance that Harris would not have been Biden’s running mate this year. Harken back to FDR, who switched running mates three times, resulting in Truman becoming President after his death.
Given that there was no formal decision made and the Democrats decided that the primary process doesn’t matter, that there would be no open convention, just shut up and line up behind Kamala, we can conclude that she is a true regime pick.
The Future
Should Kamala Harris win the election in November, it will demonstrate that voting doesn’t matter. That the regime pick will triumph every time. She will have free reign to enact whatever policies that the regime deems fit.
The regime would then be emboldened to enact the full extent of their plans. Expect more neocon warmongering against Russia, Iran, China, and other states which we are already on bad terms with. That is, should the Iranian response to an assassination inside Tehran not drag us into a war before election day.
Unlike many on the right, I do not believe that Kamala Harris is a socialist or a communist. Rather, I believe that she is neoliberalism at its ultimate conclusion: a wealthy, nationless, shopping mall society.
Harris has made overtures to certain Trump policies. She has stolen his idea of no taxation on tips, and apparently is even talking about becoming tough on the border. Do not be fooled by these overtures.
A Harris victory will continue the Biden policy of open borders. It will be a great transition: Biden, symbolic of old, white majority America, passing the torch to the multicultural new generation.
As a symbol of this new multicultural generation, Harris will have no incentive to shut the border down. After all, the entire reason that she is able to lead or be close to leading Trump in the polls is because of our lax border policies. Why risk a Republican resurgence when you can keep importing Democratic voters?
In short, a Kamala Harris victory will ensure the continuing diminishing of America’s white majority. We will become like certain Western European countries who seem intent on committing ethnic suicide.
The United States will become less like a nation and more like an international shopping mall, with people who have little loyalty to the founding ideals of the nation stepping into positions of power.
Of course, why would such a person have loyalty to a country when their ancestors didn’t have any stake in it? We talk a lot about flag burnings and how to prevent them, but the real answer that will solve most of it is to cut off all forms of immigration.
Also, let me be clear, when I speak of a diminishing white majority, I should also include black Americans in the South, Native Americans, and Mexican Americans in the Southwest who have been in this country for hundreds of years.
What I speak of is the new generations of illegal aliens being let in via the southern border or via boat and plane. Those flooding in from Africa, the Middle East, and other problematic areas with radically different culture.
Aside from immigration, we will continue to see the breakdown of law and order. The cities who have very liberal district attorneys will continue to release criminals into the streets. Given that Harris was Attorney General of California, a state famous for this problem, I would not be surprised if she wanted to take that model nationwide.
You will see more protests against supposed police violence to the point where the police as an institution will be useless because they are too scared to do anything. Riots will be allowed to happen with little to no resistance unless it somehow threatens a big election.
I was living in Missouri in 2014 when the first big instance of rioting happened over Michael Brown. The Democratic Governor at the time, Jay Nixon, was caught off guard. I remember him stuttering on the television about the response. He was so worried about what Obama would think that Ferguson nearly burned down.
Obama eventually gave the green light for Nixon to instruct the National Guard to restore order as soon as possible, but the damage was done. The precedent was set for the next ten years. Then 2020 happened with George Floyd.
Instead of a universal condemnation of rioting and political violence, multiple high-profile politicians made excuses for the criminals. If Ferguson 2014 was the test, USA 2020 was the main go.
Thank goodness Donald Trump was President at the time (though he could have done a bit more) because had Kamala or Biden been at the helm we would have seen no federal response. There would not have been federal forces sent nationwide. Should Kamala win in November and there is another big riot in the next 4-8 years she is president, expect it to be worse than 2014 and 2020.
Another big issue that needs to be addressed is LGBTQ nonsense. Harris will do absolutely nothing about transgender child genital mutilation. She would probably even encourage it in the name of progress, whatever that means now.
I remember back a little over ten years ago when transgender nonsense was just a fringe thing that everyone had a good laugh at. Now it has spread everywhere, to the halls of power and all institutions that are required to make a country function.
I read that a good percentage of my generation (generation Z) identifies as LGBTQ (or however many letters there are now). This is unsustainable for civilizational survival. What will happen fifty years down the road? Will 50% of the youngest generation identify as LGBTQ?
You can see the obvious problem here. LGBTQ ideology will lead to less children being born and thus a decline in the American population. Perhaps bisexuals can carry the entire weight on their shoulders, but I wouldn’t count on it.
Conclusion
In short, a Kamala Harris presidency would result in the cementing of neoliberal rule over the United States for a good while. I do not see any right-wing opposition being allowed to gain executive power over the next decade or so.
Given that a good chunk of the American population actively supports the neoliberal agenda, they would see this as an affirmation of what they stand for. A mandate to enact their more destructive policies on the country.
I really do not believe that Trump can keep his grip on the Republican Party if he loses this election, especially if he is imprisoned afterwards. Sure, his daughter-in-law is co-chair of the RNC, but the neoconservative wing of the party would use a loss as an excuse to launch a coup.
This would return the Republican Party to the position it was in nearly a decade ago, in which it was really just a loyal opposition to the ruling neoliberal consensus. In public they would act as if they were fighting but in private there was agreement.
I am writing this piece as a warning. I hope that I am wrong. I hope that people look at the facts and vote against Harris in November, whether you vote Republican, Green, Libertarian, etc. The arrogance of Kamala Harris must be stopped.
This is
’s first time publishing through Liberty Magazine and we just wanted to know if you would like to see more of their content featured on this publication? Take part in the poll below to let us know.If you like the article please like and share to promote Liberty Magazine and the work of Oceanus. Comment down below if you would like to also be featured on Liberty Magazine, or if you wanted to tell us how you felt about the article.
Very well reasoned article
Great post. We have had nearly ten years of a full-on assault on Trump for the crime of not caving to progressivism. In fact, he is the first to openly defy progressives, rather than capitulate.
But, followers gotta follow. Progressives mark off an easy to follow path to subservience, and that's just what some people crave.